Mugisha v Attorney General & Another (Civil Suit 45 of 2020) [2024] UGHC 303 (11 May 2024)
Court
High Court of Uganda
Case number
Civil Suit 45 of 2020
Judge
Katamba Nkwanga, J
The High Court held that execution proceeds from a prior decree were mishandled, holding the defendants liable for unpaid funds and awarding general damages and costs.
Sebuliba v Instant Cash International Limited & 3 Ors (Miscellaneous Application No. 2601 of 2018) [2020] UGHCEBD 4 (1 September 2020)
Court
High Court: Execution and Bailiffs Division (Uganda)
Case number
Miscellaneous Application No. 2601 of 2018
Judge
Wolayo, J
The High Court dismissed an objector’s challenge to execution over Masooli land, upheld the sale, and ordered the balance of proceeds paid out after costs.
Buso Foundation Ltd v Bob Mate Phillips & Anor (CIVIL APPEAL NO.40 OF 2009) [2017] UGHCCD 161 (22 December 2017)
Court
HC: Civil Division (Uganda)
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL NO.40 OF 2009
Judge
Mugambe, J
The High Court found that the trial Magistrate erred in law and fact by failing to set aside the exparte judgment, having wrongly visited the negligence of counsel on the Appellant and denied it the right to be heard. The Magistrate's court lacked jurisdiction over the employment dispute, which should have been referred to a Labour Officer under the Employment Act. The sale and transfer of the Appellant's property were conducted in contravention of mandatory legal procedures, including failure to notify the judgment debtor, lack of public auction, and improper handling of the certificate of t…
Akright Projects Ltd v Executive Property Holdings Ltd (HCT-OO-CC-MA 142 of 2009) [2009] UGCommC 56 (9 April 2009)
Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Case number
HCT-OO-CC-MA 142 of 2009
The court found that the execution and sale of the applicant's property were fundamentally irregular and unlawful. The bailiff failed to comply with mandatory procedures, including proper advertisement and notice after the stay, conducting a public auction, depositing title deeds and sale proceeds with the court, and registering the renewed warrant. The sale was conducted by private treaty on credit, without transparency or opportunity for competitive bidding, and the proceeds were unlawfully paid to the respondent's advocates. These cumulative irregularities defeated the purpose of court-sup…
Rukooge Enterprises Ltd v Engineer Muhwezi t/a Emtec Construction Service and Others (Miscellaneous Application No 83 of 2005) (Miscellaneous Application No 83 of 2005) [2006] UGHC 20 (6 June 2006)
Court
High Court of Uganda
Case number
Miscellaneous Application No 83 of 2005
The High Court struck out a miscellaneous application and the underlying plaint as nullities, finding the wrong party had not been joined as a defendant.