Gidagurija and Another v Regina
Gidagurija and Another v Regina (Criminal Appeals Nos. 172 and 173 of 1952) [1952] EACA 253 (1 January 1952)
The Court found that the interpreter did not act in a police capacity and took exceptional care to ensure the statements were voluntary and properly interpreted. The extra-judicial statements were therefore admissible. For Gamunga, the combination of his presence at the scene, failure to dissociate from the murder, post-crime association with the killer, and his claim for 'gimarda' as a reward for the killing provided sufficient corroboration and supported the trial judge's finding of guilt. For Waida, however, the evidence was insufficient to establish his guilt beyond reasonable doubt. His…
Source excerpt
- Murder
- Admissibility Of Confession
- Customary Law
- Aiding And Abetting
- Rules Of Evidence