Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Namuli v Uganda Revenue Authority (Labour Dispute Miscellaneous Application 103 of 2022) [2023] UGIC 93 (17 March 2023)
The Industrial Court declined to review its earlier award on severance pay and reinstatement, finding no apparent error or qualifying new evidence, and dismissed the application.
Nabulya v Children at Risk Action Network (CRANE) and Another (Miscellaneous Application 28 of 2022) [2023] UGIC 32 (9 March 2023)
The Industrial Court partly reviewed its award, finding errors in notice pay and severance pay calculations, but refused to reopen leave and savings claims.
Entebbe Handling Services T/a National Aviation Services (NAS) v Okello (Labour Dispute Miscellaneous Application No. 87 of 2022) [2022] UGIC 21 (20 October 2022)
The Industrial Court corrected an arithmetical error in a labour award, substituting UGX 19,584,000 for UGX 22,074,741 and making no order as to costs.
Sseyiga and Others v ZTE Uganda Limited (Labour Dispute Miscellaneous Application 21 of 2022) [2022] UGIC 50 (29 August 2022)
The Industrial Court dismissed an application to extend time and review its award, finding the grounds were really appeal grounds and no error apparent on the record was shown.
Namusoke v Cairo International Bank (Miscellaneous Application No. 3 of 2020) [2022] UGIC 31 (21 February 2022)
The court found no mistake apparent on the face of the record in its previous decision regarding the applicant's resignation notice. The applicant failed to file submissions or substantiate the alleged error. The respondent's submissions were accepted, and the court held that the requirements for review were not met. Consequently, the application was dismissed with costs awarded to the respondent, as the applicant's failure to defend the application resulted in unnecessary legal expense for the respondent.
Source excerpt
Sure Telecom v Brian Azemchap (Labour Dispute Miscellaneous Application 165 of 2019) [2020] UGIC 61 (13 March 2020)
The Industrial Court dismissed Sure Telecom’s application to review its award, holding the complaints were not apparent errors but grounds for appeal.
Mugisha v Equity Bank (Miscellaneous Application No. 70 of 2019) [2019] UGIC 210 (4 April 2019)
The court found that its previous decision in Labour Dispute Appeal 26/2017 contained an error on the face of the record by interpreting Donna Kamuli Vs DFCU to peg severance entitlement to years worked, thereby excluding employees who had worked for less than twelve months from severance allowance. This interpretation was made without considering Section 87 of the Employment Act, which entitles employees with at least six months of continuous service to severance allowance. The court held that this was a manifest error, not requiring extraneous evidence, and thus reviewable under Section 82…
Source excerpt
