Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Azinya v Vuzi (Civil Appeal 27 of 2021) [2024] UGHC 770 (22 August 2024)
The High Court set aside a land judgment from the magistrate’s court and ordered a retrial, finding the lower-court record was confusing and defective.
Masereka v Kule and Another (Civil Appeal No. 40 of 2019) [2022] UGHC 74 (11 January 2022)
The High Court dismissed a civil appeal after finding the memorandum of appeal was narrative rather than proper grounds, and upheld the dismissal with costs.
Igga & Ors v The Registered Trustees of Pentecostal Assemblies of God & Anor (MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION No. 0011 OF 2016) [2017] UGHCCD 17 (10 March 2017)
The High Court reviewed its earlier order and set aside a permanent injunction that had been issued alongside a retrial order, finding it was an error on the face of the record.
Justine Okengo v Natali Abia & oers (Civil App. No.34 Of 2004) (Civil App. No.34 of 2004) [2009] UGHC 37 (26 March 2009)
The High Court allowed an appeal over disputed land and stores, held the trial court erred on fixtures and the locus in quo, set aside the judgment, and ordered a retrial.
Kundu v Matanda (HCT-04-CV-CA-0009/2004) [2006] UGHCLD 8 (21 March 2006)
On second appeal in a land dispute, the High Court held that the missing trial record and judgment made a just decision impossible and ordered a retrial.
Patel v Rex (Criminal Appeal No. 456 of 1951.) [1952] EACA 324 (1 January 1952)
The appellate court held that quashing a conviction without ordering retrial amounted to acquittal, so the respondent could plead autrefois acquit.
Shelani v Rex (Criminal Appeal No. 172 of 1949) [1949] EACA 42 (1 January 1949)
The Court of Appeal for Eastern Africa ordered a retrial after finding an excluded statement to a magistrate should have been proved through the interpreter.
El-Jehazmi v Mohamed (Criminal Appeal No. 11 of 1928) [1928] EACA 2 (1 January 1928)
The Court of Appeal refused to consider an account not properly endorsed by the trial judge and remitted the civil appeal for retrial.
