Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Isingoma v Balinda and Another (CIVIL APPEAL NO.0052 OF 2023) [2025] UGHC 232 (3 February 2025)
The High Court set aside a magistrate’s judgment over disputed land ownership, finding the land’s location was not properly ascertained and ordering a retrial.
Warid Telecom Uganda Limited & Another v Isingoma (Civil Appeal 33 of 2022) [2024] UGHC 1093 (28 November 2024)
The High Court set aside an ex parte trial judgment as a nullity after finding the court relied on a witness statement that was never formally tendered as evidence.
Byarugaba v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 667 of 2014) [2024] UGCA 295 (15 October 2024)
The Court of Appeal set aside an aggravated defilement conviction after finding the missing trial judgment and sentencing record prejudiced the appellant’s appeal.
Mwesige v Kiiza (Civil Appeal 7 of 2022) [2024] UGHC 850 (29 August 2024)
The High Court allowed a civil appeal, set aside a judgment on admission, and ordered a retrial after finding no proof of service before ex parte hearing.
Azinya v Vuzi (Civil Appeal 27 of 2021) [2024] UGHC 770 (22 August 2024)
The High Court set aside a land judgment from the magistrate’s court and ordered a retrial, finding the lower-court record was confusing and defective.
Esomu Ebalu v Orit (Civil Appeal 35 of 2022) [2024] UGHC 754 (15 August 2024)
The High Court allowed a land appeal and ordered a retrial after finding that the suit land’s change from customary to titled tenure made the original judgment moot.
Nuwamanya v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 0353 of 2017) [2024] UGCA 354 (19 July 2024)
The Court of Appeal found the plea bargain process defective, set aside Nuwamanya Andrew’s murder conviction and sentence, and ordered a retrial.
Nestiya v Mutebi (Civil Appeal 37 of 2022) [2024] UGHC 370 (24 May 2024)
The High Court set aside a land trespass judgment and ordered a retrial after finding the trial magistrate relied on improper locus in quo evidence from a new witness.
Tatu v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 239 of 2016) [2024] UGCA 44 (21 February 2024)
The Court of Appeal held that a plea bargain cannot replace mandatory plea-taking steps. It quashed the conviction and sentence and remitted the case.
Hajji Nsimbe and Another v Luyikwe and 7 Others (Civil Appeal 31 of 2022) [2024] UGHC 30 (11 January 2024)
The High Court allowed a land appeal after finding the locus in quo visit was not properly conducted or recorded, set aside the judgment, and ordered a retrial.
