Uganda Case Law

Nyakaishiki & 3 Others v Uganda

Nyakaishiki & 3 Others v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 199 of 2015) [2024] UGCA 210 (9 August 2024)

Court

Court of Appeal of Uganda

Case number

Criminal Appeal 199 of 2015

Judge

Buteera, DCJ, Gashirabake, JA, Kihika ,JA

The Court of Appeal found that the trial judge properly admitted the confessions after a trial within a trial, and the confessions were corroborative and detailed, implicating all appellants in the murder. The evidence regarding forced entry was inconsistent with the defense, further supporting the prosecution's case. However, the sentencing order failed to clearly demonstrate that the remand period was deducted, and mitigating factors were not considered. The appellate court set aside the original sentence and re-sentenced each appellant to 35 years' imprisonment after deducting the 5 years…

Source excerpt

• Murder
• Sentencing Guidelines
• Retracted Confessions
• Remand Period Deduction

A.Walusimbi & 3 ors v Uganda

A.Walusimbi & 3 ors v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 28 of 1992) [1994] UGSC 6 (17 March 1994)

Court

Supreme Court of Uganda

Case number

Criminal Appeal 28 of 1992

Judge

Mayindo, DCJ, Oder, JSC, Platt, JSC

The Supreme Court held that the confessions of the appellants Walusimbi and Sekabembe were tainted by prolonged unlawful military detention and allegations of coercion, rendering them unreliable. The Court emphasized that corroboration is essential for retracted or repudiated confessions, and that confessions of co-accused cannot serve as corroboration. In the case of Walusimbi, independent evidence—specifically, his production of the murder weapon used in the robbery—was sufficient to sustain his conviction for aggravated robbery, even without reliance on his confession. For Twaha, the Court…

Source excerpt

• Confessions
• Corroboration
• Unlawful Detention
• Identification Evidence
• Retracted Confessions
• Joint Criminal Enterprise

Rex v Ndara and Seven Others

Rex v Ndara and Seven Others (Criminal Appeals Nos. 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139 and 140 of 1945) [1945] EACA 27 (1 January 1945)

Court

East African Court of Appeal

Case number

Criminal Appeals Nos. 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139 and 140 of 1945

Judge

Gray CJ, Sheridan CJ, Whitley CJ

Appeal from robbery with violence convictions dismissed. The court held that accomplice evidence needs independent corroboration and clarified confession use in joint trials.

• Robbery With Violence
• Accomplice Evidence
• Corroboration
• Admissibility Of Confessions
• Joint Trial
• Retracted Confessions