Namusoke v Cairo International Bank
Namusoke v Cairo International Bank (Miscellaneous Application No. 3 of 2020) [2022] UGIC 31 (21 February 2022)
The court found no mistake apparent on the face of the record in its previous decision regarding the applicant's resignation notice. The applicant failed to file submissions or substantiate the alleged error. The respondent's submissions were accepted, and the court held that the requirements for review were not met. Consequently, the application was dismissed with costs awarded to the respondent, as the applicant's failure to defend the application resulted in unnecessary legal expense for the respondent.
Source excerpt
- Review Of Award
- Error Apparent On Record
- Jurisdiction Of Court
- Resignation Notice
- Costs Award