Kirima Limited & 4 Others v Kabushenga
Kirima Limited & 4 Others v Kabushenga (Civil Suit 18 of 2022) [2024] UGCommC 200 (6 May 2024)
The court found that PW1 and PW2 were validly appointed directors of the 4th and 5th Plaintiffs at the time the suit was filed, as evidenced by resolutions and filings with URSB. No valid resolution or special notice removing them as directors was produced, nor was there evidence of compliance with section 195 of the Companies Act. The notifications of removal and appointment of new directors were either filed after the suit or not preceded by proper resolutions. The law does not require a written resolution to commence a suit; agreement by directors is sufficient. Therefore, MMAKS Advocates…
Source excerpt
- Company Directorship
- Authority To Instruct Advocate
- Board Resolutions
- Removal Of Directors
- Corporate Litigation
- Representation Of Company