Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Ntege v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 70 of 2022) [2023] UGHCCRD 17 (19 January 2023)
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal after finding a genuine claim of right over land and boundary issues that should have been resolved civilly.
Sembajjwe v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 37 of 2021) [2022] UGHCCRD 152 (23 March 2022)
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal arising from a land dispute, holding that the appellant raised a bona fide claim of right under section 7 of the Penal Code Act.
Sembajjwe v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 37 of 2021) [2022] UGHCCRD 109 (23 March 2022)
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal over land-related trespass and damage charges, holding the appellant had raised a bona fide claim of right.
Lugomba & Ors v Uganda (Criminal Misc. Application No. 025 of 2018) [2019] UGHCCRD 23 (29 April 2019)
The High Court of Uganda at Jinja granted bail pending appeal to three convicted applicants, finding the offences were non-violent, the sentences were light, and the risk of absconding was manageable.
Buyinza v Uganda (HCT-03-CR-CN-23-2017) [2017] UGHCCRD 140 (20 September 2017)
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal over removing boundary marks, holding the appellant acted under an honest claim of right over disputed land.
Karorero v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. Kab-00-cr-cn-0004-2000) [2002] UGHCCRD 199 (19 February 2002)
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, quashing convictions for trespass and removing boundary marks because the evidence and locus in quo record were insufficient.
Karorero David v Uganda (Cr.App.No.KAB-00-CR-CN-0004-2000 ) (Cr.App.No.KAB-00-CR-CN-0004-2000) [2002] UGHC 83 (19 February 2002)
The High Court quashed convictions for criminal trespass and removing boundary marks, finding the evidence insufficient and the locus visit inadequately recorded.
