Rex v Shah and Another
Rex v Shah and Another (Criminal Appeals Nos. 308 and 309 of 1948 consolidated) [1948] EACA 67 (1 January 1948)
The court held that a conviction under Regulation 13(1) required proof the storage premises were not under the accused’s occupation or control for business purposes.
- Defective Charge
- Regulatory Offences
- Burden Of Proof
- Statutory Interpretation
- Defective-charge
- Criminal-appeal