Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Election Petitions [2022] UGCA 139

Gaddaffi v Sekabira and another

Gaddaffi v Sekabira and another (Election Appeal No. 56 of 2021) [2022] UGCA 139 (6 May 2022)

The Court of Appeal held that the High Court does not have original jurisdiction to hear and determine complaints regarding the nomination of candidates; such complaints must first be lodged with the Electoral Commission, and only appeals from the Commission's decisions may be heard by the High Court. The appellant failed to exercise due diligence by not inspecting nomination papers prior to the election and did not raise his complaints at the appropriate time. The trial judge was correct to expunge evidence obtained through falsehoods and procedural defects, as the appellant misrepresented h…

  • Nomination Disputes
  • Jurisdiction Of High Court
  • Admissibility Of Evidence
  • Bribery In Elections
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Registered Voter Status
Read case analysis
Election Petitions [2021] UGHCEP 38

Nalubega v Kinyamatama and Another

Nalubega v Kinyamatama and Another (Election Petition No. 6 of 2021) [2021] UGHCEP 38 (17 September 2021)

The High Court dismissed an election petition challenging a woman MP’s qualification, holding the claim was brought too late and the respondent was a registered voter.

  • Qualification For Parliament
  • Registered Voter Status
  • Name Change And Identity
  • Electoral Process Challenges
  • Election-petitions
  • Parliamentary-qualification
Read case analysis
Date unavailable
Election Petitions [2021] UGHC 4

Nalubega v Suubi Kyinyamatama and Another

Nalubega v Suubi Kyinyamatama and Another (Election Petition No. 6 of 2021) [2021] UGHC 4 (17 September 2021)

The court found that the petitioner was aware of the alleged ineligibility of the 1st respondent prior to the election but failed to utilize the statutory remedies available under Article 61(1)(f) of the Constitution and Section 15 of the Electoral Commission Act to challenge the nomination. The electoral process is segmented, and complaints regarding nomination and qualification must be resolved before the election date. The evidence presented established that the 1st respondent, through a deed poll, statutory declaration, and matching photographs, was the same person as the registered voter…

  • Qualification For Parliament
  • Registered Voter Status
  • Change Of Name In Elections
  • Electoral Process Complaints
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.