Lamminta Commercial (U) Limited v Kiconco and Another (Misc Cause 136 of 2020)
Lamminta Commercial (U) Limited v Kiconco and Another (Misc Cause 136 of 2020) [2023] UGHCLD 151 (16 June 2023)
The application for consequential orders fails because there has been no valid recovery of the suit land by the applicant from the registered proprietor through proceedings in which both parties were present. The respondent and his predecessor were not parties to the proceedings that set aside the consent judgment, and the ruling did not address the legality of the respondent's title. Section 177 of the Registration of Titles Act requires that cancellation of title be based on recovery of land from the registered proprietor, which has not occurred. Granting the orders sought would violate the…
Source excerpt
- Consequential Orders
- Cancellation Of Title
- Recovery Of Land
- Consent Judgment
- Fair Hearing
- Registered Proprietor