Uganda Case Law

Mafumu v Harris International Limited (Labour Dispute Miscellaneous Application 6 of 2020)

Mafumu v Harris International Limited (Labour Dispute Miscellaneous Application 6 of 2020) [2024] UGIC 64 (28 November 2024)

Court

Industrial Court of Uganda

Case number

Labour Dispute Miscellaneous Application 6 of 2020

Judges

Wabwire Musana, J, Musimbi, Panel Member, Bigirimana penal member, Lapenga

The Industrial Court found that the referral of the dispute to it was procedurally improper due to significant irregularities and lack of clarity in the record. There was no credible evidence of an administrative transfer of the file between Labour Officers, and the records did not support the assertion that the original Labour Officer was functus officio. The Court determined that both the prosecution and management of the dispute before the Labour Officers were deficient, with unexplained gaps and unsupported assertions regarding the handling and transfer of the file. As a result, the decis…

Source excerpt

• Wrongful Termination
• Labour Officer Jurisdiction
• Procedural Irregularity
• Referral Procedure
• Functus Officio
• Administrative Transfer

Kizza and Another v Camusat Uganda Limited (Labour Dispute Reference No. 81 of 2017)

Kizza and Another v Camusat Uganda Limited (Labour Dispute Reference No. 81 of 2017) [2022] UGIC 25 (28 October 2022)

Court

Industrial Court of Uganda

Case number

Labour Dispute Reference No. 81 of 2017

Judge

Wabwire, J, Kagoye, Panel Member, Musimbi, Panel Member, Lapenga, Panel Member

The court held that Section 93(7) of the Employment Act is directory and not mandatory. The provision gives a claimant the option to refer a matter to the Industrial Court if the labour officer has not determined the case within 90 days, but does not require the labour officer to dispose of the dispute strictly within that period. The use of the word 'may' indicates legislative intent to provide discretion rather than impose a strict limitation. There is no statutory sanction for hearing a dispute beyond 90 days, and the absence of such a sanction supports the conclusion that the time frame i…

Source excerpt

• Limitation Periods
• Labour Officer Jurisdiction
• Statutory Interpretation
• Referral Procedure

Bamuturaki v Uganda National Airlines Corporation (Labour Dispute Miscellaneous Application 1 of 2020)

Bamuturaki v Uganda National Airlines Corporation (Labour Dispute Miscellaneous Application 1 of 2020) [2020] UGIC 54 (5 May 2020)

Court

Industrial Court of Uganda

Case number

Labour Dispute Miscellaneous Application 1 of 2020

Judge

Ruhinda-Ntengye, J, Tumusiime-Mugisha, J, Bwire, Panel Member, Nyachwo panel member, Mavunwa, Panel Member

The Industrial Court dismissed an injunction application, holding it had no jurisdiction over an original cause not referred from a labour officer.

• Probationary Termination
• Jurisdiction Of Industrial Court
• Temporary Injunctions
• Referral Procedure
• Employment Contracts
• Employment-law

Kyesimira v Stanbic Bank (U) Ltd (Labour Dispute Reference No. 103 of 2017)

Kyesimira v Stanbic Bank (U) Ltd (Labour Dispute Reference No. 103 of 2017) [2019] UGIC 16 (25 January 2019)

Court

Industrial Court of Uganda

Case number

Labour Dispute Reference No. 103 of 2017

The Industrial Court rejected a labour claim as time-barred, finding it was filed 12 years after dismissal and lacked evidence of proper referral through a labour officer.

• Limitation Periods
• Summary Dismissal
• Jurisdiction Of Industrial Court
• Referral Procedure
• Employment-law
• Limitation-periods

Washington Inima and Anor v Eltahir Mohammedi and Anor (Labour Dispute Miscellaneous Application No. 51 of 2015)

Washington Inima and Anor v Eltahir Mohammedi and Anor (Labour Dispute Miscellaneous Application No. 51 of 2015) [2015] UGIC 14 (23 September 2015)

Court

Industrial Court of Uganda

Case number

Labour Dispute Miscellaneous Application No. 51 of 2015

The Industrial Court referred this labour dispute to the High Court after the chief judge expressed discomfort sitting on the panel, citing concerns about proper adjudication.

• Panel Composition
• Jurisdiction
• Referral Procedure
• Employment-and-labour
• Panel-composition
• Referral-procedure