Uganda v Ndyabutono
Uganda v Ndyabutono (Criminal Session 129 of 2017) [2021] UGHCCRD 16 (4 March 2021)
The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused participated in the aggravated robbery. Contradictions in witness testimony regarding the identification of the accused, the absence of an identification parade, and the initial police report naming only unidentified assailants undermined the prosecution's case on direct involvement. However, the accused was found in possession of a phone recently stolen during the robbery. His explanation for possession—that he bought it from a stranger known only as 'King'—was deemed unsatisfactory, especially as h…
Source excerpt
- Aggravated Robbery
- Receiving Stolen Property
- Doctrine Of Recent Possession
- Identification Evidence
- Burden Of Proof