Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Malaba Town Council v Ekel Martin (MISC. APPLICATION NO. 15 OF 2025) [2025] UGHC 430 (30 April 2025)
The High Court refused an application to recall a witness for further cross-examination, finding the request was late, prejudicial, and brought in bad faith.
Wilobo Pe Yot Limited v Pader District Local Government (Miscellaneous Application 3 of 2024) [2025] UGHC 36 (28 January 2025)
The High Court dismissed an application to recall a witness and correct alleged transcript discrepancies, holding the record was accurate and the request was an abuse of process.
Kare Distribution Limited v African Rivers Fund (Miscellaneous Application 2714 of 2023) [2024] UGCommC 270 (25 March 2024)
The High Court dismissed an application to recall a witness and file pretrial documents, holding that the applicants had voluntarily absented themselves and abused process.
China Railway No. 3 Engineering Company Limited v Prof . Gakwandi (Miscellaneous Application 25 of 2023) [2023] UGHCCD 217 (8 June 2023)
The court found that the omission to mark the annexures to the applicant's affidavit was a minor technicality, curable under Article 126(2)(e) of the Constitution, as the documents were referenced and identifiable. The court held that, since the main suit had already been instituted, auxiliary applications such as the present one did not require a fresh company resolution. The Health, Safety and Environment officer was deemed a principal officer competent to depose the affidavit. On the substantive issue, the court exercised its discretion under Order 18 rule 13 of the Civil Procedure Rules a…
Source excerpt
Rex v Bux (Criminal Appeal No. 239 of 1947) [1947] EACA 67 (1 January 1947)
The court held that a magistrate could, in discretion, allow the prosecution to recall a witness before closing its case. The conviction and sentence were upheld.
