Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page: 1 court collection
Last checked: 18 Sep 2026, 04:12 UTC

Results update automatically as you type.

Judge

Topic

Legal area

Court

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters

1 Jan 1955

Criminal Law [1955] EACA 340

Thairu v Reginam

Thairu v Reginam (Criminal Appeal No. 141 of 1955) [1955] EACA 340 (1 January 1955)

Court: East African Court of Appeal
Case number: Criminal Appeal No. 141 of 1955
Judge: Briggs, JA, Nihill P, Worley VP

The majority of the court held that the appellant's prolonged association with an armed Mau Mau gang, including cooking for its members and being present during their terrorist activities, constituted active assistance and consorting in a manner prejudicial to public safety and public order. The court found ample evidence to support the trial judge's rejection of the appellant's defence of duress or captivity, including her conduct at arrest and testimony from witnesses. The existence of an armed terrorist gang was itself prejudicial to public safety, and any person who consorted with and ass…

Source excerpt

Consorting With Armed Persons
Emergency Regulations
Mau Mau Offences
Public Order Offences

Read case analysis

1 Jan 1953

Criminal Law [1953] EACA 30

Regina v Ngaruya and Others

Regina v Ngaruya and Others (Criminal Appeal No. 121 of 1952) [1953] EACA 30 (1 January 1953)

Court: East African Court of Appeal
Case number: Criminal Appeal No. 121 of 1952
Judge: Bourke J, Hearne CJ

The court held that for a conviction under section 32(a) of the Police Ordinance, it must be proven that the assembly was convened at a 'place of public resort' at the time invitations were issued, and that the accused were responsible for convening or directing the assembly. The evidence did not establish that Nyaga School was a place of public resort at the material time, nor that the respondents were the conveners or attendees. The English case law cited by the prosecution was deemed irrelevant, as the court was required to interpret the local statutory language in its own context. Consequ…