Center for Public Interest Law (CEPIL) and 2 Others v Attorney General (Consitutional Petition No. 9 of 2014)
Center for Public Interest Law (CEPIL) and 2 Others v Attorney General (Consitutional Petition No. 9 of 2014) [2021] UGCC 44 (23 July 2021)
The Court held that the impugned sections of the Press and Journalist Act Cap 105, including those relating to registration, licensing, accreditation, disciplinary measures, and ministerial powers, are not inconsistent with Articles 28(12), 29(1)(a) and (e), and 40(2) of the Constitution. The provisions are sufficiently defined, prescribe clear penalties, and provide minimal guidelines for enforcement, thus avoiding arbitrary application. The regulatory framework, including the composition and accountability of the Media Council, meets international standards for independence and transparency…
Source excerpt
- Freedom Of Expression
- Media Regulation
- Journalist Licensing
- Public Morality
- Fair Hearing
- Association Rights