Uganda Case Law

Nalu Tour and Travel Limited v Jinja City Council (Application No. 30 of 2022)

Nalu Tour and Travel Limited v Jinja City Council (Application No. 30 of 2022) [2022] UGPPDPAAT 29 (11 October 2022)

Court

Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Appeals Tribunal

Case number

Application No. 30 of 2022

Judges

Nerima, Panel Member, Gimara SC, Chairperson, Isanga, Ag. Chairperson, Kakira, Kyarisiima, Kalumba

The Tribunal found that the Accounting Officer failed to comply with the statutory requirement to make and communicate a decision on the Applicant's administrative review request within ten days, constituting a breach of the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act. The Tribunal determined that the Best Evaluated Bidder, Peshi Contractors Uganda Limited, did not provide sufficient evidence of three years' experience in revenue collection as required by the bidding document, and that the evaluation process was inconsistently applied, as other bidders were not subjected to the same…

Source excerpt

• Public Procurement
• Bid Evaluation
• Administrative Review
• Public Contracts
• Statutory Compliance

Meera Investments Limited v Uganda Revenue Authority and Another (Application No. 18 of 2022)

Meera Investments Limited v Uganda Revenue Authority and Another (Application No. 18 of 2022) [2022] UGPPDPAAT 17 (13 July 2022)

Court

Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Appeals Tribunal

Case number

Application No. 18 of 2022

Judges

Nerima, Panel Member, Isanga, Ag. Chairperson, Kakira, Kyarisiima, Asiimwe

The Tribunal upheld Meera Investments’ procurement challenge, finding the accounting officer’s late review decision invalid and ordering a re-evaluation of bids.

• Public Procurement
• Bid Evaluation
• Administrative Review
• Public Contracts
• Public-procurement
• Bid-evaluation

Uganda Tax Operators & Drivers Association v Kampala Capital Council Authority (Misc. Application 137 of 2011)

Uganda Tax Operators & Drivers Association v Kampala Capital Council Authority (Misc. Application 137 of 2011) [2012] UGHC 14 (30 January 2012)

Court

High Court of Uganda

Case number

Misc. Application 137 of 2011

Judge

Mwangusya, J

The High Court held that a dispute over a taxi park management contract was not suitable for judicial review because it was a contractual, not supervisory, matter.

• Judicial Review
• Public Contracts
• Ultra Vires Decisions
• Natural Justice
• Municipal Authorities
• Judicial-review