Mugarura v Attorney General
Mugarura v Attorney General (Constitutional Petition No. 23 of 2009) [2015] UGCC 5 (29 September 2015)
The court held that the petition disclosed a matter for constitutional interpretation as it alleged acts and cited constitutional provisions allegedly contravened. On the substantive issues, the court found that the petitioner failed to prove that the named commissioners lacked high moral character, proven integrity, or the requisite experience and competence. The court reviewed the commissioners' qualifications and experience, noting their professional backgrounds, prior service, and participation in numerous elections and international observation missions. The court further held that the C…
Source excerpt
- Electoral Commissions
- Public Appointments
- Parliamentary Procedure
- Constitutional Interpretation