Atto Jackline V Uganda
Atto Jackline V Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 146/2004) [2009] UGCA 43 (6 October 2009)
The Court found that the appellant's actions were systematic and premeditated, including luring the five-year-old victim, tying her neck, stuffing her mouth, and throwing her into a pit latrine. The eleven-hour gap between the threat and the killing negated the immediacy required for a provocation defence. The wrongful acts by PW3 and his family did not amount to adequate provocation that would deprive an ordinary person of self-control. The appellant's knowledge and indifference to the victim's death satisfied the requirements for malice aforethought. The claim that the appellant was a minor…
Source excerpt
- Murder
- Provocation Defence
- Malice Aforethought
- Sentencing Of Minors