Kasenke v Katambala & Anor (MISC. APPLICATION N0. 47 OF 2014)
Kasenke v Katambala & Anor (MISC. APPLICATION N0. 47 OF 2014) [2017] UGHCCD 204 (17 August 2017)
The court found that the applicant, as the holder of Letters of Administration for the estate of the late Kasenke Sedulaki, had a legitimate interest in Plot 16A, which was affected by the consent judgment entered between the respondents. There was no evidence that Anthony Kasenke had authority to act for the estate or that the estate received any money as alleged. The inclusion of the estate in the consent judgment without proper representation or authority rendered the relevant paragraphs of the judgment susceptible to review under Section 82 of the Civil Procedure Act and the principles in…
Source excerpt
- Consent Judgment Variation
- Review Of Judgment
- Locus Standii
- Property Ownership Dispute