Uganda v Wamukuyu (Miscellaneous Application 83 of 2024) [2024] UGHCACD 10 (27 November 2024)
Court
HC: Anti corruption Division (Uganda)
Case number
Miscellaneous Application 83 of 2024
Judge
Okuo-Kajuga, J
The High Court’s Anti-Corruption Division granted an ex parte restraining order over several properties linked to the respondent, except one title not sufficiently proved.
Uganda v Ezeh Chukuebuka (Criminal Session Case 6 of 2023) [2023] UGHCACD 8 (4 October 2023)
Court
HC: Anti corruption Division (Uganda)
Case number
Criminal Session Case 6 of 2023
Judge
Gidudu, J
The court found that the accused's possession of USD 289,980 was intentional but not criminal, as he voluntarily disclosed the money and requested to declare it to customs. The prosecution failed to establish that the funds were proceeds of crime or that the accused had knowledge of such at the time of receipt. The investigation was inadequate, relying on hearsay and failing to verify the accused's declaration in Nigeria or establish a predicate offence. The immigration and investigating officers acted outside their mandate and misunderstood the law governing cross-border currency movement. T…
Biira v Uganda (DPP) and Another (HC Miscellaneous Application 1261 of 2018) [2020] UGHCEBD 11 (18 May 2020)
Court
High Court: Execution and Bailiffs Division (Uganda)
Case number
HC Miscellaneous Application 1261 of 2018
Judge
Gaswaga, J
The High Court held that a family home occupied by the objector and children was matrimonial property and not available for attachment to satisfy compensation.
Biira v Uganda/DPP and 2 Others (MA 1261 of 2018) [2020] UGHCEBD 12 (18 May 2020)
Court
High Court: Execution and Bailiffs Division (Uganda)
Case number
MA 1261 of 2018
Judge
Gaswaga, J
The court found that the applicant was in possession of the suit property at the time of attachment and held an interest in it on her own account, not merely in trust for the judgment debtor. The property was established as matrimonial property, jointly contributed to and serving as the family home since 2008. Attachment and sale of the property would adversely affect the welfare of the children, contravening constitutional and statutory principles prioritizing children's interests. The compensation order issued against the judgment debtor did not entitle the respondents to attach the matrimo…