Bishop Balagadde Ssekadde and Others v Wamala and Others
Bishop Balagadde Ssekadde and Others v Wamala and Others (Civil Appeal No. 0027 of 2011) [2019] UGCA 2113 (2 December 2019)
The Court of Appeal found that the High Court trial was conducted in violation of the mandatory procedures set out in the Civil Procedure Rules. The trial judge adopted a process unknown to law by requiring all evidence to be adduced by affidavit without calling witnesses for oral testimony or cross-examination, despite the nature of the dispute requiring such. This amounted to a denial of a fair trial and rendered the proceedings incomplete and irregular. The resultant judgment was therefore a nullity and could not stand. The Court of Appeal set aside the High Court judgment and ordered a re…
Source excerpt
- Trial Irregularity
- Procedure On Evidence
- Retrial Orders
- Land Title Disputes