Attorney General of the Republic of Rwanda v Kalali (Application No.6 of 2020)
Attorney General of the Republic of Rwanda v Kalali (Application No.6 of 2020) [2022] EACJ 15 (23 June 2022) (First Instance Division)
The court found that all three requirements for the doctrine of res judicata were satisfied: (1) the parties in Application No. 1 of 2020 and the instant application are identical; (2) the matter in issue—extension of time to file an additional affidavit—is directly and substantially the same; and (3) Application No. 1 of 2020 was heard and determined by way of dismissal, constituting a final decision. The applicant had the opportunity to withdraw the defective affidavit and seek a different remedy but chose not to do so. The court was not persuaded by the applicant's argument that the previo…
Source excerpt
- Res Judicata
- Extension Of Time
- Affidavit Filing
- Procedural Bar