Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2023] UGCC 118

Attorney General v Sundya and 5 Others

Attorney General v Sundya and 5 Others (Constitutional Application 26 of 2022) [2023] UGCC 118 (26 May 2023)

The court found that the applicant satisfied all the established conditions for the grant of a stay of execution pending appeal. The applicant lodged a notice of appeal within the prescribed time, raising serious constitutional and legal issues that warrant consideration by the Supreme Court. The court held that it is not necessary at this stage to determine the merits of the appeal, only that there is a substantial question to be adjudicated. The court further determined that if a stay is not granted, the appeal could be rendered nugatory, as the release of inmates serving long sentences wou…

  • Stay Of Execution
  • Appeal Procedure
  • Prisoner Rights
  • Compensatory Damages
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2022] UGHC 150

Abooki v Uganda

Abooki v Uganda (Criminal Miscellaneous Application 1 of 2023) [2022] UGHC 150 (12 July 2022)

The applicant failed to show sufficient cause for not filing the appeal within the prescribed time, as ignorance of the law and inability to hire an advocate are not adequate grounds; prisoners have the option to engage prison authorities to lodge appeals. However, the application was brought promptly, and there is no evidence of dilatory conduct. The intended appeal is plausible, and denying the extension would risk injustice. Therefore, in the interests of justice and given the absence of undue delay, the court exercises its discretion to grant an extension of time for the applicant to file…

  • Extension Of Time To Appeal
  • Criminal Appeal Procedure
  • Prisoner Rights
  • Sufficient Cause For Delay
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2017] AfCHPR 124

Mugesera v Republic of Rwanda (Application No. 012/2017)

Mugesera v Republic of Rwanda (Application No. 012/2017) [2017] AfCHPR 124 (28 September 2017)

The African Court granted provisional measures for Léon Mugesera, ordering Rwanda to provide access to lawyers, family contact, and needed medical care.

  • Right To Fair Trial
  • Inhuman And Degrading Treatment
  • Access To Medical Care
  • Right To Family Communication
  • Prisoner Rights
  • Provisional-measures
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2016] UGHRC 10

Minge Douglas v Attorney General (Complaint UHRC 231 of 2006)

Minge Douglas v Attorney General (Complaint UHRC 231 of 2006) [2016] UGHRC 10 (26 October 2016)

The Tribunal found that the complainant's evidence of torture and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment by prison warders was credible, consistent, and unchallenged. The complainant suffered severe physical and mental pain intentionally inflicted by state agents acting in their official capacity, fulfilling all elements of torture under international and domestic law. The respondent failed to provide any alternative explanation for the injuries sustained while in custody. The Attorney General is vicariously liable for the acts of prison warders committed in the course of their employment. Th…

  • Freedom From Torture
  • Vicarious Liability
  • Compensation For Human Rights Violation
  • Prisoner Rights
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2004] UGHCCRD 12

Musiime v Uganda (HCT-05-CR-MA-0004-2004)

Musiime v Uganda (HCT-05-CR-MA-0004-2004) [2004] UGHCCRD 12 (10 March 2004)

High Court ruling on a bail application based on illness: the court found the statutory proof insufficient for bail but ordered access to the applicant’s doctor in prison.

  • Bail Application
  • Exceptional Circumstances
  • Grave Illness
  • Prisoner Rights
  • Bail-application
  • Medical-bail
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.