Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [1956] EACA 9

Rashid and Another v The Queen

Rashid and Another v The Queen (Criminal Appeal No. 166 of 1956; Criminal Appeal No. 167 of 1956) [1956] EACA 9 (1 January 1956)

The court upheld convictions for moving maize without a permit, holding that unexplained circumstances can support a probable presumption of guilt.

  • Burden Of Proof
  • Presumption Of Guilt
  • Movement Of Maize
  • Criminal Liability
  • Evidence In Criminal Cases
  • Burden-of-proof
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1948] EACA 66

Rex v Karingu

Rex v Karingu (Criminal Appeal No. 111 of 1948) [1948] EACA 66 (1 January 1948)

The court varied a burglary conviction to theft after finding no evidence of breaking, upheld the 12-month sentence, and discouraged notes added after judgment.

  • Burglary
  • Theft
  • Presumption Of Guilt
  • Recent Possession
  • Magistrate Practice
  • Recent-possession
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1940] EACA 58

Barton v Rex

Barton v Rex (Criminal Appeal No. 70 of 1941) [1940] EACA 58 (1 January 1940)

The court upheld a theft conviction based on recent possession of a stolen rifle, but reduced the sentence to a fine after finding the original term excessive.

  • Theft
  • Recent Possession
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Presumption Of Guilt
  • Sentencing
  • Fraudulent Conversion
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1938] EACA 199

Rex v Mohamed (Cr. App No. 77/1938)

Rex v Mohamed (Cr. App No. 77/1938) [1938] EACA 199 (1 January 1938)

The court held that the prosecution proved the coffee was stolen, that it was in the appellant's possession, and that circumstances supported an inference of receiving and guilty knowledge. The appellant, a licensed coffee dealer, failed to produce his register as required, denied having coffee, and provided a false explanation for possession. The thief's evidence was confirmed by other facts, and the magistrate was justified in accepting it. The presumption of fact against the accused was properly applied, and the appellant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation. The prosecution discha…

  • Receiving Stolen Property
  • Presumption Of Guilt
  • Guilty Knowledge
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Evidence Of Receiving
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1937] EACA 166

Rex v Achietu (Cr.A. 81/1934.)

Rex v Achietu (Cr.A. 81/1934.) [1937] EACA 166 (1 January 1937)

The Court of Appeal held that suspicious circumstantial evidence was not enough to prove murder, and quashed the conviction.

  • Circumstantial Evidence
  • Standard Of Proof
  • Murder
  • Presumption Of Guilt
  • Circumstantial-evidence
  • Standard-of-proof
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.