Panchal v Rex
Panchal v Rex (Criminal Appeal No. 163 of 1941) [1940] EACA 62 (1 January 1940)
The court held that possession of a stolen ring nearly 15 months after theft did not create a presumption of dishonest possession, and the conviction was quashed.
- Receiving Stolen Property
- Presumption Of Dishonest Possession
- Recent Possession
- Evidence Of Possession
- Burden Of Proof
- Receiving-stolen-property