Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2025] UGHC 273

Aruho v Uganda Coffee Development Authority

Aruho v Uganda Coffee Development Authority (Civil Suit No. 46 of 2024) [2025] UGHC 273 (25 April 2025)

The High Court dismissed a civil suit for want of prosecution after both parties failed to comply with pre-trial directions and did not attend court.

  • Dismissal For Want Of Prosecution
  • Non Compliance With Court Orders
  • Pre Trial Procedure
  • Dismissal-for-want-of-prosecution
  • Non-compliance-with-court-orders
  • Pre-trial-procedure
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] UGCommC 60

Lwanga v Ziwa Rhino and Wildlife Ranch Ltd

Lwanga v Ziwa Rhino and Wildlife Ranch Ltd (Miscellaneous Application 763 of 2024) [2025] UGCommC 60 (20 March 2025)

The High Court ordered the respondent to disclose specified bank statements used in its audit report, but refused discovery of alleged annual grazing payments.

  • Discovery Of Documents
  • Bank Statement Disclosure
  • Audit Report Evidence
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Pre Trial Procedure
  • Discovery-of-documents
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2023] UGHCICD 12

Uganda v Kiyemba (HCT-00-ICD-CR-SC 1 of 2023)

Uganda v Kiyemba (HCT-00-ICD-CR-SC 1 of 2023) [2023] UGHCICD 12 (2 May 2023)

The High Court ICD confirmed charges against Jamal Kiyemba for alleged ADF-related terrorism offences, finding sufficient evidence at pre-trial stage.

  • Terrorism Offences
  • Anti Terrorism Act
  • Evidential Burden
  • Confirmation Of Charges
  • Pre Trial Procedure
  • Standard Of Proof
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2022] UGHCICD 9

Uganda v Sserwadda & 6 Others

Uganda v Sserwadda & 6 Others (Miscellaneous Cause 14 of 2022) [2022] UGHCICD 9 (3 October 2022)

The court found that there was credible evidence of objectively justifiable risk to the safety and wellbeing of the seventeen prosecution witnesses due to threats and the delicate security situation in Masaka. The court held that full disclosure of their identities at the pre-trial stage would endanger them and could negatively affect the prosecution's case. The court determined that the protective measures sought—delayed, redacted, and summary disclosure, limitation of access, and keeping a log—would not cause injustice to the accused, as full disclosure would be made at least fifteen days b…

  • Witness Protection
  • Disclosure Of Evidence
  • Fair Trial Rights
  • Pre Trial Procedure
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.