Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Okello Newton and Others v Angia Ogola (Civil Appeal 16 of 2018) [2025] UGHC 382 (4 June 2025)
The High Court partly allowed a land appeal, setting aside orders over the whole suit land and protecting only the portion proved by the respondent.
Muhangi & Another v Ssekubwa (Civil Appeal 42 of 2022) [2025] UGHCCD 1 (2 January 2025)
The High Court allowed a civil appeal, set aside an order releasing a disputed vehicle, and held the appellants’ custody was lawful as estate administrators.
Kasegu and 6 Others v Kazimura (Civil Appeal 86 of 2022) [2024] UGHC 1164 (8 November 2024)
High Court appeal over a land trespass dispute allowed after finding the trial court misread the evidence and the respondent failed to prove ownership.
Oryx Oil Uganda Limited v Hi-Tech Foam Limited (Civil Suit 870 of 2018) [2024] UGCommC 363 (4 November 2024)
The court found that while the law requires contracts exceeding twenty-five currency points to be in writing, this requirement can be satisfied by any signed writing that reasonably identifies the subject matter and terms, and part performance may render an oral contract enforceable in equity. However, the plaintiff failed to discharge the burden of proof on a balance of probabilities. The evidence presented by the plaintiff, including delivery notes and statements of account, contained inconsistencies and errors, such as incorrect invoices and unexplained reversals. The delivery notes did no…
Source excerpt
Kyogonza v Nyakato (Civil Appeal 31 of 2023) [2024] UGHC 843 (29 August 2024)
The High Court allowed an appeal over ownership of disputed land, set aside the trial judgment, and declared the appellant the owner, with the respondent a trespasser.
Douglas Nure v Solomon Ogwang Ayo (Civil App.No.1 Of 2005) (Civil App.No.1 of 2005) [2008] UGHC 117 (27 November 2008)
The High Court dismissed a civil appeal, holding there was no error in the magistrate’s evaluation of evidence or award of special damages.
Interfreight (U) Ltd v Haji Ahmed Nsubuga (HCT-00-CC 156 of 2005) [2005] UGCommC 77 (22 December 2005)
The High Court held that a claim on a verbal guarantee was barred by Section 3(1) of the Contract Act because no written, signed guarantee or memorandum was pleaded or proved.
