Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Owora v Magode Ikuya and Others (CIVIL SUIT NO.0030 OF 2022) [2024] UGHC 1238 (7 November 2024)
The High Court dismissed a land suit as time barred, holding the cause of action arose in 1999 and no limitation exception was properly pleaded.
Bright Emmanuel v Grand Victoria Limited (Labour Dispute Claim 107 of 2018) [2019] UGIC 36 (21 June 2019)
The Industrial Court overruled a preliminary objection to a counterclaim, holding it arose from the employment dispute and could proceed with the main claim.
Nagawa & anor v Segawa & Ors (Civil Suit No. 27 of 2012) [2014] UGHCCD 14 (4 February 2014)
The Plaintiffs' suit was fundamentally defective for failing to plead the necessary particulars of fraud as required by Order 6 rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The Plaint did not allege sufficient facts to establish a cause of action against the Defendants, nor did it demonstrate the Plaintiffs' interest in the suit land or how the Defendants procured the title fraudulently. The mandatory requirements for pleading fraud and disclosing a cause of action were not met. The absence of these particulars rendered the suit frivolous, vexatious, and incapable of being cured by amendment. Consequ…
Source excerpt
Attorney General and Another v Kamoga and Another (Civil Appeal No. 8 of 2004) [2008] UGSC 39 (6 March 2008)
The Supreme Court held that the High Court judge had jurisdiction to entertain the application for review of the consent judgment entered by the registrar, as the registrar's powers do not include review jurisdiction. The application for review was based on discovery of new and important matter, which under Order 46 could be heard by any judge, not necessarily the one who entered the decree. However, the Court found that the appellants' ignorance of the pleaded fraud in the second amended written statement of defence did not amount to ignorance of a material fact sufficient to vitiate the con…
Source excerpt
