Melson v Holm (C.C. No. 165/1935)
Melson v Holm (C.C. No. 165/1935) [1937] EACA 208 (1 January 1937)
The court held that a sole proprietor could sue for the firm’s debt, rejected an unpleaded cross-claim, and found a payment-deferral term void for uncertainty.
- Sole Proprietorship
- Debt Recovery
- Contract Uncertainty
- Pleading And Practice
- Sole-proprietorship
- Debt-recovery