Uganda Case Law

Sebabi & Ors v Uganda Revenue Authority

Sebabi & Ors v Uganda Revenue Authority (Civil Suit No 62 of 2006) [2013] UGHCCD 63 (30 April 2013)

Court

HC: Civil Division (Uganda)

Case number

Civil Suit No 62 of 2006

The plaintiffs were employed on permanent and pensionable terms under the old Human Resources Management Manual, which entitled them to a long service award at 2.5% of gross annual pay upon termination or retirement. The new Human Resources Management Manual, effective 1st August 2004, provided for a 15% gratuity only for employees appointed on contract under its provisions. No evidence was adduced that any plaintiff was appointed on contract under the new manual; thus, their claim for gratuity at 15% is unsustainable. The retrenchment package paid to the plaintiffs included payment in lieu o…

Source excerpt

• Termination Of Employment
• Gratuity Entitlements
• Pension Rights
• Computation Of Benefits
• Damages Claims

Bank of Uganda v Betty Tinkamanyire

Bank of Uganda v Betty Tinkamanyire [2008] UGSC 21 (16 December 2008)

Court

Supreme Court of Uganda

The Supreme Court held that the respondent's dismissal was unlawful and that compensation for wrongful dismissal is limited to payment in lieu of notice, not the full period up to retirement or speculative benefits. The Court found the lower courts erred in awarding damages for the period up to retirement and for bonuses, leave, and allowances. However, given the respondent's humiliation, loss of reputation, and exemplary service, the Court awarded aggravated damages of UGX 100,000,000 and ordered payment of accrued pension and terminal benefits. Punitive damages were disallowed as not applic…

Source excerpt

• Wrongful Dismissal
• Aggravated Damages
• Pension Rights
• Quantum Of Damages

Obol John v Gulu Municipal council Civil Suit No. 81 Of 2004

Obol John v Gulu Municipal council Civil Suit No. 81 Of 2004 (Civil suit No.81 Of 2004) (Civil suit No.81 of 2004) [2008] UGHC 105 (30 September 2008)

Court

High Court of Uganda

Case number

Civil suit No.81 of 2004

The High Court held that the plaintiff’s suit was not time-barred and that his employment was unlawfully terminated after prolonged interdiction.

• Unlawful Termination
• Public Service Protection
• Limitation Periods
• Salary Entitlements
• Pension Rights
• Unlawful-termination

Mukasa v Uganda Revenue Authority (HCCS No. 528 of 2005)

Mukasa v Uganda Revenue Authority (HCCS No. 528 of 2005) [2007] UGHC 46 (21 August 2007)

Court

High Court of Uganda

Case number

HCCS No. 528 of 2005

Judge

Arach-Amoko J

The court found that the plaintiff was employed on permanent and pensionable terms under the old HRMM and not on contract. The new HRMM provisions regarding gratuity at 15% were suspended due to financial constraints and never implemented for non-management staff. Therefore, the plaintiff was only entitled to the Long Service Award at 2.5% of basic annual salary, not the claimed gratuity. Regarding NSSF contributions, while the statutory duty to remit rests with the employer, the plaintiff may seek judicial review for mandamus but cannot recover the contributions directly in an ordinary suit.…

Source excerpt

• Gratuity Entitlement
• Nssf Contributions
• Pension Rights
• Public Officer Definition

Uganda Electricity Board v Bagamuhunda and Ors

Uganda Electricity Board v Bagamuhunda and Ors (Miscellaneous Application No.349 of 2003) [2003] UGHC 17 (23 October 2003)

Court

High Court of Uganda

Case number

Miscellaneous Application No.349 of 2003

The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to properly plead or prove at trial that retrenchment packages should be deducted from the pension entitlements awarded by the decree. The trial court had already determined that the retrenchment packages were severance payments and did not replace or offset pension rights. The appellant did not seek a review or appeal of the main decree on this issue, nor did it certify any adjustment or satisfaction of the decree as required by law. The registrar, in making the garnishee order absolute, acted within her jurisdiction and correctly applied…

Source excerpt

• Garnishee Proceedings
• Execution Of Decree
• Pension Rights
• Retrenchment Packages

Nsereko Joseph and Ors v Bank of Uganda

Nsereko Joseph and Ors v Bank of Uganda [2003] UGSC 15 (20 March 2003)

Court

Supreme Court of Uganda

The Supreme Court of Uganda held that employees who accepted voluntary termination under a restructuring scheme were not entitled to pension unless they met the early-retirement criteria.

• Pension Rights
• Voluntary Retirement
• Employment Contracts
• Severance Packages
• Pension-rights
• Voluntary-retirement