Uganda v Nakaweesi Jane and Others (Criminal Session No. 191 of 2023) [2025] UGHC 499 (10 July 2025)
Court
High Court of Uganda
Case number
Criminal Session No. 191 of 2023
Judge
Lubega, J
The High Court acquitted Ssengabi Ronald of aggravated robbery after finding the prosecution failed to prove use of a deadly weapon or his participation beyond reasonable doubt.
Mayinja Peter & 7 Others V Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 278 of 2017) [2019] UGCA 2020 (13 September 2019)
Court
Court of Appeal of Uganda
Case number
Criminal Appeal No. 278 of 2017
Judge
Cheborion, JA, Egonda-Ntende, JA, Musota, JA
The Court found that the prosecution proved all the ingredients of aggravated robbery against the appellant: theft was established through eyewitness testimony, violence and use of deadly weapons were confirmed by medical and witness evidence, and the appellant's participation was corroborated by his arrest at the scene. The absence of direct testimony from the victim regarding the stolen money did not negate the offence, as circumstantial and supporting evidence sufficed. On sentencing, the Court held that while the trial judge considered aggravating and mitigating factors, the sentence of 2…
Uganda v Salabwa & Anor (Htc-00-cr-sc-0791--2016) [2018] UGHCCRD 106 (16 May 2018)
Court
HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)
Case number
Htc-00-cr-sc-0791--2016
Judge
Kwesiga, J
The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that William Salabwa and Mugerwa Vincent participated in the killing of Mutabazi Enock. The evidence presented by the prosecution was riddled with material contradictions, particularly in the testimony of key witnesses, and was inconsistent with police statements recorded contemporaneously with the incident. Defence evidence, including independent witnesses, suggested that the fatal injury may have been inflicted by a policeman during a chaotic confrontation. The prosecution did not establish the requisite mens rea o…