Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2025] UGCA 188

Rusongwa Medard v Uganda

Rusongwa Medard v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 0282 of 2019) [2025] UGCA 188 (13 June 2025)

The Court of Appeal found that the trial judge erred by failing to arithmetically deduct the period spent on remand from the sentence, contrary to Article 23(8) of the Constitution and the Supreme Court's decision in Rwabugande Moses vs Uganda. Additionally, the trial judge did not adequately consider mitigating factors, particularly the appellant's advanced age, as required by the Sentencing Guidelines. The appellate court, exercising its powers under Section 11 of the Judicature Act, set aside the ambiguous and illegal sentence and resentenced the appellant to 30 years' imprisonment, deduct…

  • Sentencing Principles
  • Aggravated Defilement
  • Remand Period Deduction
  • Mitigating Factors
  • Parity And Consistency
  • Custodial Sentences
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2024] UGCA 296

Karatungi v Uganda

Karatungi v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 108 of 2016) [2024] UGCA 296 (16 October 2024)

The Court of Appeal found that the trial judge failed to comply with mandatory constitutional and statutory provisions by not deducting the remand period from the sentence and not considering mitigating factors. Article 23(8) of the Constitution and Section 15(2) of the Sentencing Guidelines require the period spent on remand to be arithmetically deducted from the sentence. The absence of consideration for mitigating factors such as the Appellant's age, plea of guilty, and first-offender status rendered the sentence illegal. The appellate court, guided by parity and consistency in sentencing…

  • Sentencing Guidelines
  • Remand Period Deduction
  • Mitigating Factors
  • Parity And Consistency
  • Illegal Sentence
  • Murder
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2024] UGCA 183

Iranya v Uganda

Iranya v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 329 of 2020) [2024] UGCA 183 (19 July 2024)

The Court of Appeal upheld a 23-year-and-5-month sentence for murder, finding the trial judge properly weighed aggravating and mitigating factors and applied parity principles.

  • Sentencing Principles
  • Murder
  • Parity And Consistency
  • Mitigating Factors
  • Aggravating Factors
  • Criminal-sentencing
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.