Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2025] UGHC 223

Uganda v Ssemuga and Another

Uganda v Ssemuga and Another (Criminal Appeal 18 of 2023) [2025] UGHC 223 (26 March 2025)

High Court appeal on prima facie case, false pretences, personation, and conspiracy. The court upheld the acquittals on those counts but found one reasoning error.

  • Prima Facie Case
  • Obtaining Money By False Pretences
  • Personation
  • Conspiracy To Commit Felony
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Appellate Review
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2024] UGHCCRD 56

Majid v Uganda

Majid v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 116 of 2023) [2024] UGHCCRD 56 (6 September 2024)

The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, quashed a conviction for obtaining money by false pretences, and set aside compensation and fine orders.

  • Obtaining Money By False Pretences
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Evaluation Of Evidence
  • Presumption Of Innocence
  • Criminal-appeal
  • False-pretences
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2024] UGHCCRD 31

Kavuma v Uganda

Kavuma v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 59 of 2022) [2024] UGHCCRD 31 (31 March 2024)

High Court dismissed a criminal sentence appeal, holding that the trial magistrate properly considered remand time, guilty plea, and mitigation before confirming the sentence.

  • Sentencing Principles
  • Remand Period Deduction
  • Mitigating Factors
  • Obtaining Money By False Pretences
  • Uttering False Documents
  • Sentencing-principles
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2024] UGHCCRD 11

Oluka v Uganda

Oluka v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 32 of 2023) [2024] UGHCCRD 11 (15 February 2024)

The sentence imposed by the trial magistrate was within the statutory range and appropriately considered both aggravating and mitigating factors. However, the trial court's ambiguous reference to the remand period rendered the sentence illegal for failing to comply with Article 23(8) of the Constitution, which requires a precise deduction of time spent on remand. The appellate court recalculated the sentence to account for six months and 29 days spent on remand, resulting in a net sentence of two years, five months, and one day. Additionally, the trial court did not expressly order compensati…

  • Sentencing Guidelines
  • Obtaining Money By False Pretences
  • Remand Period Deduction
  • Compensation To Victims
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2019] UGSC 77

Baingana v Uganda

Baingana v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 10 of 2016) [2019] UGSC 77 (28 June 2019)

The Supreme Court found that the appellant had, on the balance of probabilities, satisfied the sentence by payment of the fine, as evidenced by the cashier's acknowledgment and the appellant's release from custody, despite the absence of a formal receipt. Therefore, the default imprisonment sentence imposed by the Court of Appeal was unwarranted. The Court further held that the Court of Appeal erred in enhancing the compensation order by imposing interest at 21% and requiring payment within 7 days, as there was no justification for interfering with the trial court's discretion in sentencing.…

  • Obtaining Money By False Pretences
  • Conspiracy To Defraud
  • Sentencing And Fines
  • Compensation Orders
  • Appellate Jurisdiction
  • Double Jeopardy
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2018] UGHCCRD 225

Sunday Alex V Uganda (High Court Criminal Appeal No. 29 of 2018)

Sunday Alex V Uganda (High Court Criminal Appeal No. 29 of 2018) [2018] UGHCCRD 225 (15 August 2018)

The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, quashing a conviction for obtaining money by false pretences after finding evidential inconsistencies, burden-shifting, and a civil dispute.

  • Obtaining Money By False Pretences
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Evaluation Of Evidence
  • Compensation Orders
  • Obtaining-money-by-false-pretences
  • Burden-of-proof
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2017] UGHCCRD 142

Maganda & Anor v Uganda (HCT-03-CR-CN-60-2014)

Maganda & Anor v Uganda (HCT-03-CR-CN-60-2014) [2017] UGHCCRD 142 (19 September 2017)

The High Court upheld convictions for obtaining money by false pretences and conspiracy to commit a felony arising from a fraudulent land sale, but reduced the sentence to fines with default terms.

  • Obtaining Money By False Pretences
  • Conspiracy To Commit Felony
  • Sentencing
  • Evidence Evaluation
  • Obtaining-money-by-false-pretences
  • Conspiracy-to-commit-felony
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2016] UGHCCRD 94

Kavuma v Uganda

Kavuma v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No.55 of 2015) [2016] UGHCCRD 94 (27 June 2016)

The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal against convictions for theft of a motor vehicle and obtaining money by false pretences, upholding the sentences.

  • Theft Of Motor Vehicle
  • Obtaining Money By False Pretences
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Evaluation Of Evidence
  • Sentencing Principles
  • Criminal-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2015] UGHCCRD 451

Mugwanya v Uganda

Mugwanya v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No.125 of 2014) [2015] UGHCCRD 451 (3 November 2015)

High Court criminal appeal on false pretences and conspiracy dismissed, with the prison sentence reduced to reflect 16 months spent on remand.

  • Obtaining Money By False Pretences
  • Conspiracy To Commit Felony
  • Sentencing Remand Credit
  • Compensation Order
  • Evidence Corroboration
  • Burden Of Proof
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2015] UGHCCRD 56

Atuhwere v Uganda

Atuhwere v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 41 of 2015) [2015] UGHCCRD 56 (4 September 2015)

The appellate court found that the Trial Magistrate properly evaluated both direct and circumstantial evidence, including the complainant's testimony, identity card, sale agreement, and the appellant's own admissions. The appellant's photograph on the identity card and passport, his admission of partial payment, and the corroborating evidence from the Registrar of Titles and the real land owner established fraudulent intent and false pretence. Procedural complaints regarding final addresses and calling additional witnesses were dismissed as neither mandatory nor prejudicial, with no miscarria…

  • Obtaining Money By False Pretences
  • Fraudulent Land Transfer
  • Evaluation Of Evidence
  • Right To Call Witnesses
  • Procedural Fairness
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.