Makubuya v Buliamu Muwanga Kibrige t/a Kowloon Garment Industry and Another
Makubuya v Buliamu Muwanga Kibrige t/a Kowloon Garment Industry and Another (Civil Appeal No. 1 of 2015) [2022] UGCA 75 (10 March 2022)
The Court of Appeal found that the schedule to the warrant of attachment was defective due to the ambiguous use of 'ETC', which led to the attachment of property not specifically listed. This defect rendered the warrant ambiguous and resulted in excessive attachment. However, the bailiff executed the warrant as drawn and could not be faulted for following its terms. The valuation of the attached property was reasonable, considering depreciation and wear, and the open market value provided by M/s Systems Engineers was accepted. The appellant's objection to the attachment was filed three months…
Source excerpt
- Execution Of Judgments
- Attachment And Sale Of Property
- Valuation Of Attached Property
- Warrants Of Attachment
- Objections To Execution
- Declaratory Judgments