Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Election Petitions [2017] UGCA 1

Achiro & Anor Vs Kidega

Achiro & Anor Vs Kidega (Election Petition Appeal No. 19 of 2016) [2017] UGCA 1 (6 February 2017)

The Court of Appeal upheld nullification of the Aruu North parliamentary election after violence destroyed ballot materials and prevented a recount in a two-vote margin contest.

  • Vote Recount
  • Noncompliance With Electoral Laws
  • Parliamentary Elections Act
  • Evidence Evaluation
  • Substantial Effect On Election Results
  • Election-petition-appeal
Read case analysis
Election Petitions [2016] UGHCEP 73

Ayena Odongo v Okello Engola and 4 Ors (Parliamentary Election Petition No. 8 of 2016)

Ayena Odongo v Okello Engola and 4 Ors (Parliamentary Election Petition No. 8 of 2016) [2016] UGHCEP 73 (28 June 2016)

The Court of Appeal dismissed an election appeal over Aruu North, upholding nullification of the MP election after failed recount proceedings and substantial noncompliance.

  • Vote Recount Procedure
  • Noncompliance With Electoral Laws
  • Parliamentary Elections Act
  • Substantial Effect On Election Results
  • Election-petitions
  • Vote-recount-procedure
Read case analysis
Election Petitions [2016] UGHCEP 38

Spenser George William v Abas Agaba Mugisa and Anor

Spenser George William v Abas Agaba Mugisa and Anor (Election Petition No. 6 of 2016) [2016] UGHCEP 38 (4 June 2016)

The court found that the petition was fatally defective due to lack of specific pleadings and credible affidavit evidence supporting the alleged malpractices and election offences. The applicant failed to prove, to the required standard, that the 1st respondent or his agents committed bribery, intimidation, or other electoral offences with the respondent's knowledge, consent, or approval. The evidence presented was largely generalized, hearsay, or unsupported by particulars such as names, dates, or documentary proof. The court further held that the applicant did not establish that any noncomp…

  • Parliamentary Elections
  • Electoral Malpractice
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Bribery Of Voters
  • Intimidation
  • Noncompliance With Electoral Laws
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.