Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2025] UGHCCD 73

Uganda Law Society and Isaac Ssemakadde v Tonny Tumukunde and Byamaziiima Joshua

Uganda Law Society and Isaac Ssemakadde v Tonny Tumukunde and Byamaziiima Joshua (Miscellaneous Application 81 of 2025) [2025] UGHCCD 73 (17 June 2025)

The High Court granted leave to appeal and stayed proceedings after finding arguable grounds over joinder of the Attorney General as a necessary party.

  • Leave To Appeal
  • Stay Of Proceedings
  • Necessary Parties
  • Judicial Discretion
  • Interlocutory Orders
  • Leave-to-appeal
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] UGHC 331

Stanbic Bank (U) Limited v Kenneth Mambo T/A Remedy Business Ventures and Bakaima Investments Limited

Stanbic Bank (U) Limited v Kenneth Mambo T/A Remedy Business Ventures and Bakaima Investments Limited (Civil Suit No. 0557 of 2023) [2025] UGHC 331 (7 May 2025)

The High Court held that Bakaima Investments Limited was a necessary party, but ordered the 1st defendant to pay its costs after the consent judgment.

  • Costs Award
  • Necessary Parties
  • Banking Agency Agreement
  • Breach Of Contract
  • Title Transfer
  • Settlement Agreement
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2020] UGHCCD 223

Tibagwa & 4 Ors v Yaya Ucame & 2 Ors (MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION No. 039 OF 2014)

Tibagwa & 4 Ors v Yaya Ucame & 2 Ors (MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION No. 039 OF 2014) [2020] UGHCCD 223 (19 August 2020)

The court found that the applicants, having been decreed as lawful owners of the suit land in a previous consent judgment, have a direct legal interest in the subject matter of Civil Suit No. 21 of 2014. The orders sought in the main suit, including cancellation of the certificate of title, would directly affect their interests. The court held that their joinder as defendants is necessary to enable it to effectually and completely adjudicate upon and settle all questions involved in the suit and to avoid a multiplicity of proceedings. The court exercised its discretion under Order 1 rule 10(2…

  • Joinder Of Parties
  • Necessary Parties
  • Land Ownership Disputes
  • Multiplicity Of Suits
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2017] UGHCLD 96

Kadene & Ors v Abalema United Effort Ltd & Ors (Miisc Application No. 1463 of 2017)

Kadene & Ors v Abalema United Effort Ltd & Ors (Miisc Application No. 1463 of 2017) [2017] UGHCLD 96 (6 November 2017)

The High Court allowed disabled applicants to be joined as co-defendants in a land dispute, finding they had an arguable interest in the suit property.

  • Joinder Of Parties
  • Necessary Parties
  • Interest In Suit Property
  • Allocation Of Land
  • Disabled Persons Rights
  • Joinder-of-parties
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.