Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2019] UGHCCRD 103

Uganda v Byansi

Uganda v Byansi (Criminal Session Case No. 280 of 2014) [2019] UGHCCRD 103 (3 March 2019)

The High Court struck out a murder indictment against Byansi Peter for omitting malice aforethought, treating the defect as incurable and discharging him.

  • Defective Indictment
  • Murder Elements
  • Malice Aforethought
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Defective-indictment
  • Murder-elements
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1994] UGHC 52

Uganda v Tako

Uganda v Tako (Criminal Session Case 258 of 1993) [1994] UGHC 52 (9 May 1994)

The court found that the accused, together with other soldiers, engaged in a common unlawful purpose to torture suspected wizards, resulting in the death of Filimoni Pili. The evidence established that the accused was present, participated in the torture, and did not dissociate himself from the acts leading to death, satisfying the requirements of common intention under section 22 of the Penal Code Act. However, the court held that the prosecution failed to prove malice aforethought, as the intention was to torture rather than to kill, and the weapons used were not inherently lethal. Conseque…

  • Manslaughter
  • Murder Elements
  • Common Intention
  • Malice Aforethought
  • Unlawful Killing
Read case analysis
Date unavailable
Criminal Law [2019] UGHCCRD 16

Uganda v Byansi

Uganda v Byansi (Criminal Session Case No. 280 of 2014) [2019] UGHCCRD 16 (26 March 2019)

The indictment for murder was incurably defective because it omitted the mandatory ingredient of malice aforethought in the particulars of the charge. This omission contravened statutory requirements under the Trial on Indictment Act and the Penal Code Act, and was supported by binding and persuasive case law. The defect could not be cured by amendment at the late stage of proceedings, as all evidence had been called and the accused would be prejudiced. Even if the indictment were valid, the prosecution failed to prove the elements of murder beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, the proceedi…

  • Defective Indictment
  • Murder Elements
  • Malice Aforethought
  • Burden Of Proof
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.