Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Commercial And Corporate [2004] UGCommC 7

Aqua Plumbing (U) Ltd v United Assurance Co Ltd

Aqua Plumbing (U) Ltd v United Assurance Co Ltd (Civil Suit No. 431 of 2002) [2004] UGCommC 7 (14 March 2004)

The court held that the plaintiff’s comprehensive motor insurance had expired before the accident and was not renewed in time, so the suit for compensation failed.

  • Insurance Contracts
  • Motor Vehicle Insurance
  • Policy Renewal
  • Risk Coverage
  • Insurance-contracts
  • Motor-vehicle-insurance
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1994] UGHC 109

Vickery TA v Uganda

Vickery TA v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 1 of 1994) [1994] UGHC 109 (11 March 1994)

The High Court quashed a conviction for unlawful use of a motor vehicle, holding that the charge was defective and the plea equivocal, making the proceedings a nullity.

  • Traffic Offences
  • Motor Vehicle Insurance
  • Plea Equivocality
  • Charge Deficiency
  • Equivocal-plea
  • Defective-charge
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1950] EACA 70

Max (Contractors), Limited v Rex

Max (Contractors), Limited v Rex (Criminal Appeal No. 174 of 1950) [1950] EACA 70 (1 January 1950)

The court held that the insurance policy was not in force in respect of the unqualified driver because the policy only covered persons permitted under licensing laws to drive. The owner's ignorance of the driver's lack of a Certificate of Competency was immaterial due to the strict wording of the policy, which did not require knowledge of disqualification for coverage to be excluded. The English case cited by the appellant was distinguished on the basis that the policy there required knowledge of the driver's lack of qualification, whereas the present policy did not. Therefore, the defendant…

  • Motor Vehicle Insurance
  • Third Party Risks
  • Policy Coverage
  • Driver Qualification
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1950] EACA 101

Rex v Singh

Rex v Singh (Criminal Appeal No. 368 of 1950 (Case Stated)) [1950] EACA 101 (1 January 1950)

The court upheld an acquittal for lack of valid third-party insurance, holding that statutory provisions prevented the insurer from avoiding liability for licence breaches.

  • Motor Vehicle Insurance
  • Third Party Risks
  • Policy Conditions
  • Licensing Requirements
  • Motor-vehicle-insurance
  • Third-party-risks
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.