Kiondu v Reginam
Kiondu v Reginam (Criminal Appeal No. 87 of 1956) [1950] EACA 526 (1 January 1950)
The court held that accessory-after-the-fact liability under section 397 depends on motive or purpose, not merely the inevitable effect of assistance.
- Accessory After The Fact
- Motive Vs Intention
- Corroboration Of Accomplice Evidence
- Murder
- Penal Code Interpretation
- Accessory-after-the-fact