JurisAssist Uganda Case Law
Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Search and filter Uganda case law

Results update automatically as you type.

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2024] UGCommC 151

Jamada v Hardscreen Logistics Limited & 2 Others

Jamada v Hardscreen Logistics Limited & 2 Others (Miscellaneous Application 345 of 2024) [2024] UGCommC 151 (3 May 2024)

Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Case number
Miscellaneous Application 345 of 2024
Judge
Ocaya, J

The court held that the applicant failed to properly commence an appeal as required by Order 50 Rule 8, which mandates that appeals from registrar's orders be by motion on notice, not by notice of appeal. Furthermore, the purported appeal was filed out of time, with no evidence of a timely request for certified copies to justify exclusion of time under Section 79(2) of the Civil Procedure Act. The applicant also failed to provide any good cause for the delay or to seek an extension of time. Additionally, the applicant did not comply with the court's order to deposit 30% security as required u…

Source excerpt

  • Stay Of Execution
  • Appeals Procedure
  • Registrar Orders
  • Mortgage Regulation Compliance
Read case analysis
Employment And Labour [2023] UGIC 69

Ojiambo v Centenary Rural Development Bank Limited

Ojiambo v Centenary Rural Development Bank Limited (Miscellaneous Application 197 of 2022) [2023] UGIC 69 (3 April 2023)

Court
Industrial Court of Uganda
Case number
Miscellaneous Application 197 of 2022
Judge
Wabwire, J, Namara, Panel Member, Nabirye, Panel Member, Matovu, Panel Member

The application for interim injunctive relief fails on two preliminary grounds: first, there is no pending substantive application as required by Order 50 Rule 3A(3) of the Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules, 2019; second, the applicant did not comply with Regulation 13(1) of the Mortgage Regulations, 2012, which mandates deposit of 30% of the forced sale value before seeking injunctive relief on mortgaged property. The court found no evidence of a substantive application with a likelihood of success, nor proof of the required deposit. The nature of the relief sought was not interim but pendin…

Source excerpt

  • Interim Injunctions
  • Mortgage Regulation Compliance
  • Unfair Termination
  • Loan Liability
  • Industrial Court Jurisdiction
  • Irreparable Injury
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.