Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Commercial And Corporate [1938] EACA 171

Lobo v Alibhai

Lobo v Alibhai (Civil Appeal No. 38/1938) [1938] EACA 171 (1 January 1938)

The court held that a borrower who receives the memorandum copy when signing a moneylending contract satisfies section 10(1), so the appeal succeeded.

  • Moneylending Contracts
  • Statutory Compliance
  • Enforceability Of Contracts
  • Moneylending-contracts
  • Statutory-compliance
  • Contract-enforceability
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [1938] EACA 183

Amin v Joanes and Another

Amin v Joanes and Another (Civil Case No. 159 of 1938) [1938] EACA 183 (1 January 1938)

The court held that the contract was unenforceable because it failed to state the date of the loan and did not express the interest rate as a rate per centum per annum, both being material requirements under section 10 of the Moneylenders Ordinance, 1932. The omission of the date was a material defect, and the contract could not be supplemented by external documents such as the acknowledgment letter. The acknowledgment letter of 15th September, 1937, while confirming the debt, only contained a conditional undertaking to repay ('we will try our best to liquidate the loan'), which did not satis…

  • Moneylending Contracts
  • Statutory Compliance
  • Unenforceability Of Contracts
  • Limitation Periods
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [1937] EACA 175

Tricumdass v Official Assignee and Another (C.A. 19/1934.)

Tricumdass v Official Assignee and Another (C.A. 19/1934.) [1937] EACA 175 (1 January 1937)

The Court of Appeal for Eastern Africa held that a moneylender’s mortgage was unenforceable for non-compliance with Zanzibar’s Moneylenders Decree section 10.

  • Moneylending Contracts
  • Enforceability Of Security
  • Bankruptcy Trustee Rights
  • Statutory Compliance
  • Memorandum Requirements
  • Moneylending-contracts
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [1935] EACA 42

Ram and Son v Singh and Another (C.A. 17/1934.)

Ram and Son v Singh and Another (C.A. 17/1934.) [1935] EACA 42 (1 January 1935)

The appellants, by their own pleading, are general moneylenders and do not fall within the exception of section 2(1)(b) of the Moneylenders Ordinance, 1932. The transaction was a loan secured by a chattels mortgage, and the appellants failed to demonstrate that their business was bona fide confined to lending money on mortgages. Section 10 of the Ordinance requires a separate note or memorandum in writing, signed by the borrower, containing all terms of the contract including the date of the loan. The only document produced was the chattels mortgage, which did not specify the date the loan wa…

  • Moneylending Contracts
  • Chattels Mortgage
  • Statutory Compliance
  • Loan Enforceability
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.