Mutooro and Another v Monday and 3 Others
Mutooro and Another v Monday and 3 Others (Miscellaneous Application 38 of 2024) [2024] UGHC 1033 (30 October 2024)
The court found that the delay in filing the reply to the counterclaim was due to a mistake by the applicants' advocate, who failed to notice the counterclaim after it was served on his clerk. The court held that such a mistake, though negligent, constitutes sufficient cause for granting leave to file a reply out of time, as established by binding authorities. The court further considered that both the main suit and the counterclaim concern ownership of the same land, and it is in the interests of justice and fairness that both claims be heard and determined on their merits in a single procee…
Source excerpt
- Extension Of Time
- Counterclaim Procedure
- Mistake Of Advocate
- Default Judgment
- Reply To Counterclaim