Kizza & 1 Ors v Uganda Land Commission & Ors (Miscillenous Application No. 1237 of 2013)
Kizza & 1 Ors v Uganda Land Commission & Ors (Miscillenous Application No. 1237 of 2013) [2014] UGHCLD 44 (5 November 2014)
The court found that the consent judgment was vitiated by a fundamental mistake and misapprehension of facts regarding the identity of the parties, specifically the confusion between the applicants (Abalema United Effort CBO) and the 2nd respondent (Abalema Disabled United Effort (U) Ltd). The 1st respondent acted under the mistaken belief that it was dealing with the applicants when in fact it was dealing with the 2nd respondent. This misapprehension, coupled with allegations of fraud and forgery, and the fact that the consent judgment was entered into contrary to a prior court order requiri…
Source excerpt
- Consent Judgment Review
- Mistake And Fraud
- Party Identity Dispute
- Setting Aside Judgments