Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
7 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2024] UGHC 1063

Sanyu v China Railway Group & Another

Sanyu v China Railway Group & Another (Civil Suit 11 of 2024) [2024] UGHC 1063 (22 October 2024)

The court held that the Plaintiff sued a non-existent entity by naming 'China Railway Group' as the 1st Defendant, when the actual contracting party was 'China Railway No. 3 Engineering Group Ltd.' The Plaintiff failed to establish the legal personality of the 1st Defendant as named, and did not seek to amend the plaint to correct the misnomer. As a result, the suit against the 1st Defendant was a nullity. Regarding the 2nd Defendant, the plaint failed to disclose any facts or annexes establishing a cause of action, as required by law. The only reference to the 2nd Defendant was the existence…

  • Misjoinder Of Parties
  • Cause Of Action
  • Vicarious Liability
  • Pleadings
  • Compensation For Damage
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2023] UGHCLD 294

Sebuguzu and Another v Pride Microfinance Limited

Sebuguzu and Another v Pride Microfinance Limited (Miscellaneous Application 165 of 2023) [2023] UGHCLD 294 (15 September 2023)

The court found that there was a misjoinder of parties in the main suit, as the Applicants had separate loan transactions and securities, and ordered that two separate suits be filed. The application by the 2nd Applicant was dismissed for lack of supporting affidavit evidence. Regarding the temporary injunction, the court held that while the Applicant raised a prima facie case due to discrepancies in the outstanding amount, she failed to demonstrate irreparable loss, as sale of mortgaged property is a foreseeable consequence of default. The court granted a temporary injunction to the 1st Appl…

  • Temporary Injunction
  • Mortgage Enforcement
  • Misjoinder Of Parties
  • Affidavit Evidence
  • Security For Injunction
  • Costs Award
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2023] UGCommC 282

Ssekatawa & 3 Others v Mogo Loans SMC Limited

Ssekatawa & 3 Others v Mogo Loans SMC Limited (Civil Suit 503 of 2021) [2023] UGCommC 282 (12 April 2023)

The High Court dismissed a suit by four borrowers against a money lender, finding misjoinder of parties and no clear cause of action.

  • Money Lending Agreements
  • Chattel Mortgage
  • Misjoinder Of Parties
  • Security Interest In Movable Property
  • Cause Of Action
  • Illegality In Contract
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2022] UGHC 135

Mupa Technical Services Ltd v Isingiro District Local Government

Mupa Technical Services Ltd v Isingiro District Local Government (Civil Suit 10 of 2022) [2022] UGHC 135 (15 December 2022)

The High Court held that misnaming the defendant as a district local government, instead of the district local government council, was a curable error and allowed amendment.

  • Misjoinder Of Parties
  • Amendment Of Pleadings
  • Capacity To Sue And Be Sued
  • Misjoinder-of-parties
  • Amendment-of-pleadings
  • Capacity-to-sue-and-be-sued
Read case analysis
Employment And Labour [2021] UGIC 30

Buyondo and 117 Others v Uganda Clays Limited (Labour Dispute Reference No. 305 of 2019)

Buyondo and 117 Others v Uganda Clays Limited (Labour Dispute Reference No. 305 of 2019) [2021] UGIC 30 (21 May 2021)

The court found that the preliminary objection lacked merit. The claim was not frivolous or vexatious, as it was based on a demand for terminal benefits and breach of a Collective Bargaining Agreement, whose existence was not denied by the respondent. The court held that a cause of action existed, based on the fact of termination and alleged breach of employment contracts. The differences in employment dates and circumstances of termination did not prevent joinder of causes of action under Order 1 rule 1 CPR, as the relief sought arose from the same employer and a common question of law. The…

  • Unlawful Termination
  • Collective Bargaining Agreement
  • Misjoinder Of Parties
  • Cause Of Action
  • Procedural Irregularity
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2020] UGCommC 34

Mutebi v Nam Chhau Trading Co Ltd

Mutebi v Nam Chhau Trading Co Ltd (Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 4 of 2020) [2020] UGCommC 34 (16 October 2020)

The court found that the respondent's deponent had locus standi as there was no timely or substantive challenge to his directorship, and that the absence of attached proof was not fatal in the circumstances. The court held that the plaint disclosed a cause of action against the applicant, as the pleadings and evidence, including a personal written commitment by the applicant, supported the respondent's claim. The court determined that the suit was not frivolous or vexatious; the failure to attach a certificate of incorporation or the misdescription of parties did not render the suit defective…

  • Cause Of Action
  • Corporate Personality
  • Misjoinder Of Parties
  • Frivolous And Vexatious Suits
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2020] UGHCCD 151

Abex Tour & Safaris Company Ltd v Sabiiti & Anor

Abex Tour & Safaris Company Ltd v Sabiiti & Anor (MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 28 OF 2020) [2020] UGHCCD 151 (3 July 2020)

The court found that Abex Tour & Safaris Company Limited is not a registered company and therefore does not exist in law. A suit against a non-existent party is a nullity and cannot be cured by amendment, regardless of the respondents' intentions or mistakes. The respondents' failure to verify the existence of the company before instituting the suit was a grave error. Consequently, the plaint was struck out for being incompetent. On the issue of costs, the court held that although a successful party is ordinarily entitled to costs, there was good cause to deny costs in this case. The applican…

  • Striking Out Plaint
  • Non Existent Parties
  • Costs Award
  • Misjoinder Of Parties
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2017] UGCA 60

Abdulrahman Elamin Vs Dhabi Group

Abdulrahman Elamin Vs Dhabi Group (Civil Appeal No. 215 of 2013) [2017] UGCA 60 (16 November 2017)

The Court of Appeal held that the plaint did not disclose a cause of action against the 2nd and 3rd respondents, as they were not parties to the contract alleged to have been breached. The contract was between the appellant and Warid Telecom International LLC, not the named respondents, and the principle of corporate personality precluded liability for entities not privy to the contract. Furthermore, the 1st respondent, Dhabi Group, was found not to exist as a legal entity within the jurisdiction of the Ugandan courts, rendering any suit against it a nullity. The Court rejected the argument t…

  • Cause Of Action
  • Corporate Personality
  • Privity Of Contract
  • Misjoinder Of Parties
  • Amendment Of Pleadings
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2016] UGHCFD 19

Serwadda & Ors v Nakiyamu Anor

Serwadda & Ors v Nakiyamu Anor (Civil Suit No. 31 of 2013) [2016] UGHCFD 19 (28 June 2016)

The High Court overruled a preliminary objection that counsel had a conflict of interest. It held the 2nd defendant had never been counsel’s client, so no prejudice was shown.

  • Professional Conduct Of Advocates
  • Conflict Of Interest
  • Letters Of Administration
  • Misjoinder Of Parties
  • Conflict-of-interest
  • Professional-conduct-of-advocates
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2015] UGHCCD 74

Akera v Akello (HCT-02-CV–Ca–0038-2014)

Akera v Akello (HCT-02-CV–Ca–0038-2014) [2015] UGHCCD 74 (30 July 2015)

The High Court of Uganda set aside a lower-court judgment and decree after finding the suit proceeded against the wrong defendant.

  • Misjoinder Of Parties
  • Amendment Of Pleadings
  • Execution Of Judgments
  • Identity Of Parties
  • Civil-procedure
  • Misjoinder-of-parties
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.