Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Tort Law [2022] UGHC 123

Bwaligonza v Katwere & Others

Bwaligonza v Katwere & Others (Civil Appeal 5 of 2015) [2022] UGHC 123 (25 August 2022)

High Court civil appeal on a road accident: vicarious liability was found against the 2nd respondent, contributory negligence was upheld, and special damages were corrected.

  • Vicarious Liability
  • Contributory Negligence
  • Assessment Of Damages
  • Master Servant Relationship
  • Vicarious-liability
  • Contributory-negligence
Read case analysis
Tort Law [1938] EACA 169

Owen Thomas and Company v Hansraj and Another

Owen Thomas and Company v Hansraj and Another (Civil Appeal No. 7 of 1939) [1938] EACA 169 (1 January 1938)

The court held that liability for the negligent act of the driver rests with the party who retains control over the manner in which the work is performed. In this case, although the lorry and driver were hired out to the second respondent, the driver remained the employee of the appellants, who selected, paid, and could dismiss him. The hirers could direct where the lorry should go and what loads to carry, but did not control the manner of driving. There was no evidence that the hirers interfered with or assumed control over the driver's method of driving at the time of the accident. Therefor…

  • Vicarious Liability
  • Master Servant Relationship
  • Negligence
  • Liability Of Hirer
  • Personal Injury
  • Motor Vehicle Accidents
Read case analysis
Tort Law [1937] EACA 207

Patel and Another v Tandree and Another (C.C. 44/ 1935 (Mombasa))

Patel and Another v Tandree and Another (C.C. 44/ 1935 (Mombasa)) [1937] EACA 207 (1 January 1937)

The court found that although the second defendant was generally permitted to drive the vehicle for the first defendant's business, on the day of the accident he was not acting within the scope of his employment but was instead on a personal frolic. The evidence established that the accident occurred during a private outing, not in the course of the master's business. The presumption of vicarious liability arising from ownership was rebutted by the facts. Therefore, the first defendant was not liable for the second defendant's negligent acts. However, the second defendant was found negligent…

  • Negligence
  • Vicarious Liability
  • Master Servant Relationship
  • Damages Assessment
  • Scope Of Employment
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.