Uganda Case Law

Rex v Manyakutama

Rex v Manyakutama (Criminal Appeal No. 126 of 1948) [1948] EACA 29 (1 January 1948)

Court

East African Court of Appeal

Case number

Criminal Appeal No. 126 of 1948

Judge

Edwards CJ, Gray CJ, Nihill P

The court held that the appellant's actions did not result from sudden provocation, as he had time to reflect on his wife's confession before assaulting her. The repetition of the confession and the delay between the initial disclosure and the assault negated the element of suddenness required for provocation under section 202 of the Tanganyika Penal Code. Furthermore, the severity and location of the blows administered by the appellant demonstrated an intention to inflict grievous harm, satisfying the mens rea for murder. The appellant's claim of lack of intent to seriously injure was reject…

Source excerpt

• Murder
• Provocation
• Intent
• Adultery Confession
• Manslaughter Reduction

Rex v Oba

Rex v Oba (Criminal Appeal No. 90 of 1941) [1941] EACA 98 (1 January 1941)

Court

East African Court of Appeal

Case number

Criminal Appeal No. 90 of 1941

Judge

Sheridan CJ, Webb CJ, Whitley CJ

The Court of Appeal for Eastern Africa upheld a murder conviction, holding that the alleged insulting words were not sufficient provocation to reduce the offence.

• Murder
• Provocation
• Insulting Words
• Manslaughter Reduction
• Self Control
• Penal Code Section 192