Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Constitutional Law [2024] AfCHPR 30

Jinyamu v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 015/2018)

Jinyamu v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 015/2018) [2024] AfCHPR 30 (13 November 2024)

The African Court found Tanzania violated rights to life and dignity by imposing a mandatory death sentence and hanging, but rejected the fair trial claim.

  • Right To Life
  • Mandatory Death Penalty
  • Right To Dignity
  • Cruel Inhuman Degrading Treatment
  • Fair Trial Rights
  • Judicial Discretion In Sentencing
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2024] AfCHPR 28

Kalonge v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 024/2018)

Kalonge v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 024/2018) [2024] AfCHPR 28 (13 November 2024)

The African Court held that Tanzania’s mandatory death penalty violated the right to life and that hanging violated dignity, but dismissed the other claims.

  • Mandatory Death Penalty
  • Right To Life
  • Right To Dignity
  • Fair Trial Standards
  • Method Of Execution
  • Exhaustion Of Local Remedies
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2024] AfCHPR 24

Nyerere v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 023/2018)

Nyerere v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 023/2018) [2024] AfCHPR 24 (13 November 2024)

The court found that the mandatory imposition of the death penalty under Tanzanian law violates Article 4 of the African Charter, as it deprives judicial officers of discretion and fails to consider individual circumstances, rendering the punishment arbitrary and contrary to the right to life. The method of execution by hanging was held to violate Article 5, as it constitutes cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment and undermines human dignity. The applicant's allegations of torture and unfair trial were not substantiated, as domestic courts had addressed these issues and no manifest error or…

  • Mandatory Death Penalty
  • Right To Life
  • Right To Dignity
  • Fair Trial Rights
  • Torture And Inhuman Treatment
  • Remedies And Reparations
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2024] AfCHPR 27

Bazil v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 027/2018)

Bazil v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 027/2018) [2024] AfCHPR 27 (13 November 2024)

The African Court found no fair trial violation in Lameck Bazil’s murder conviction, but held that Tanzania’s mandatory death penalty and hanging violated the rights to life and dignity.

  • Right To Life
  • Right To Dignity
  • Fair Trial
  • Mandatory Death Penalty
  • Method Of Execution
  • Fair-trial
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2024] AfCHPR 34

Zabron v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 051/2016)

Zabron v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 051/2016) [2024] AfCHPR 34 (4 June 2024)

The African Court found Tanzania violated Zabron’s rights to life, dignity, fair trial, and consular assistance, but not effective legal representation or interpreter rights.

  • Right To Life
  • Mandatory Death Penalty
  • Right To Dignity
  • Fair Trial Standards
  • Consular Assistance
  • Prison Conditions
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2024] AfCHPR 4

Gabriel and Another v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 050/2016)

Gabriel and Another v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 050/2016) [2024] AfCHPR 4 (13 February 2024)

The Court found that the mandatory imposition of the death penalty for murder under Section 197 of the Respondent State's Penal Code violates Article 4 of the Charter by arbitrarily depriving individuals of the right to life, as it removes judicial discretion and fails to consider individual circumstances. Furthermore, execution by hanging is inherently degrading and violates Article 5 of the Charter. The Applicants' claims regarding violations of the right to a fair trial, non-discrimination, and equal protection were dismissed due to lack of substantiation and evidence. The Court held that…

  • Mandatory Death Penalty
  • Right To Life
  • Right To Dignity
  • Fair Trial Standards
  • Method Of Execution
  • Exhaustion Of Local Remedies
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2023] AfCHPR 44

John v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 049/2016)

John v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 049/2016) [2023] AfCHPR 44 (7 November 2023)

The Court held that the mandatory imposition of the death penalty under Section 197 of the Tanzanian Penal Code constitutes an arbitrary deprivation of the right to life, violating Article 4 of the African Charter. The Court reaffirmed its jurisprudence that such mandatory sentencing precludes judicial discretion and consideration of mitigating factors, rendering the penalty arbitrary. Furthermore, the method of execution by hanging is inherently degrading and violates the right to dignity under Article 5 of the Charter. The Court found no violation of the Applicant's fair trial rights under…

  • Right To Life
  • Mandatory Death Penalty
  • Right To Dignity
  • Cruel Inhuman Degrading Treatment
  • Fair Trial Standards
  • Judicial Discretion In Sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2023] AfCHPR 11

Mussa v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 031/2016)

Mussa v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 031/2016) [2023] AfCHPR 11 (13 June 2023)

The Court found that the applicant's conviction was based on a confession determined by the High Court and affirmed by the Court of Appeal to be voluntary, corroborated by other evidence, and not obtained under duress. The Court held that it is not an appellate body but may assess whether domestic proceedings meet international human rights standards. The applicant failed to prove that his application for review was properly filed and served, or that there was undue delay attributable to the state. The Court also found that the applicant was represented by state-funded counsel at all relevant…

  • Fair Trial Rights
  • Right To Be Heard
  • Right To Counsel
  • Right To Appeal
  • Admissibility Of Evidence
  • Mandatory Death Penalty
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2023] AfCHPR 8

Mgira v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 003/2019)

Mgira v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 003/2019) [2023] AfCHPR 8 (13 June 2023)

The African Court held that Thomas Mgira’s fair-trial and equality claims failed, finding no manifest error in the domestic courts’ assessment of identification evidence.

  • Fair Trial Rights
  • Equality Before Law
  • Visual Identification Evidence
  • Mandatory Death Penalty
  • Exhaustion Of Local Remedies
  • Fair-trial-rights
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2022] AfCHPR 36

Msuguri v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 052/2016)

Msuguri v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 052/2016) [2022] AfCHPR 36 (1 December 2022)

The African Court found that the mandatory imposition of the death penalty under Tanzanian law violated the applicant's right to life and fair trial as protected by Articles 4 and 7 of the African Charter. The Court held that, although the domestic courts considered the applicant's insanity defense, the law deprived the sentencing judge of discretion to impose a lesser sentence based on individual circumstances, rendering the deprivation of life arbitrary. The Court further determined that the applicant's prolonged pre-trial detention of over six years and extended time on death row constitut…

  • Right To Life
  • Mandatory Death Penalty
  • Fair Trial Rights
  • Pre Trial Detention
  • Inhuman Or Degrading Treatment
  • Judicial Discretion
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.