Editor in Chief & Printing, Publishing Company New Vision v Sekandi & Anor
Editor in Chief & Printing, Publishing Company New Vision v Sekandi & Anor (Civil Appeal No. 33 of 2011) [2013] UGHCCD 16 (1 February 2013)
The High Court found that the substance of the published article was true: the respondents had been arrested and detained on suspicion of stealing a cow, and this was accurately reported. The subsequent investigation, which established the cow belonged to one respondent, was not part of the story at the time of publication. The timing of the article, though after the respondents' release, did not alter the truth of the events as reported. The trial magistrate erred in focusing on the timing and malice, rather than the substantial truth of the publication. Since justification (truth) was estab…
Source excerpt
- Defamation
- Justification Defence
- Malice In Defamation
- Assessment Of Damages
- Media Law
- Libel